Presentism and Future Generations: A Moral-Philosophical Perspective on Policy Obligations

Abstract

This article examines several ethical theories to inform policymaking, calling for a balance between responsibilities to present and future individuals. Imagine that no obligation is exclusively owed to the living. Their recognisability, vulnerability, and ability to participate in reciprocal moral exchanges necessitate their priority in practice, such as healthcare, reducing poverty, and making society fairer. Addressing climate change, protecting the environment, and mitigating nuclear risk will have a significant impact on future generations. If policymakers fail to attend to these duties, it will put intergenerational equity and long-term human flourishing at risk. The finding highlights that reasonable policymaking must consider the pros and cons of both the present and the future, which involves alleviating immediate pain while also following precautionary principles, avoiding unnecessary economic depreciation, and promoting sustainability. This strategy reduces short-termism and ensures that everyone is treated fairly over the long term. It protects the well-being of both current and future citizens.